VadeLab

High Court of Australia case law

Judgments from the High Court of Australia with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.

AllowedHigh Court of Australia·1976

High Court Grants Murder Appeal for Fresh Trial

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1977

Employer’s Right to Indemnity Limited by Third Party Damages

In this case, the High Court decided that when an employee dies due to another person’s negligence, their employer can only claim back from the negligent party what they actually owe in damages. The employer cannot recover a person than the amount of damages awarded to the a person's family.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1956

High Court Upholds Taxability of Investment Property Sale Profits

In this case, the High Court decided that profits made from selling a property used as an investment by a company are taxable income. The court ruled against the appellant who argued these profits should not be taxed because the property was bought to generate rental income over time rather than for resale.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1982

High Court Upholds Admissibility of Ethical Evidence in Defamation Case

AllowedHigh Court of Australia·1959

High Court Rules: Moving Existing Buildings Not Prohibited by Zoning Laws

The High Court ruled that moving an existing building within the same property does not violate zoning laws, allowing the appeal and dismissing the council's declaration against the business. The court determined that such actions are protected under local ordinances and do not constitute erecting a new structure.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1979

High Court Upholds Appeals to Privy Council from South Australia

AllowedHigh Court of Australia

High Court Allows Deduction for Machine Pallets Used in Manufacturing

In this case, the High Court of Australia determined that a person pallets used in manufacturing concrete roofing tiles do not qualify as moulds under a specific section of the Income Tax Assessment Act. As a result, the a person was allowed to claim an investment deduction for these items.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1979

High Court Rejects Appeal in Contempt Case Involving Prevarication

RefusedHigh Court of Australia

High Court Rejects Tax Appeal for Land Sale Profit

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1969

High Court: Alimony Settlement Clause Void

The High Court ruled that a clause in a divorce settlement deed, which aims to settle all future claims for alimony and maintenance, is against a person and therefore unenforceable. As a result, other provisions dependent on this clause are also invalid.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1964

High Court Rejects Deduction Claim for Exclusive Sales Agreements

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1954

High Court Upholds Decision Against Buyer in Oat Delivery Dispute

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1957

High Court Upholds Validity of Commonwealth Industrial Court

In this case, the High Court upheld the legality of the Industrial Relations Court and its power to punish contempt despite challenges from a labor union. the address ruled that the mixed judicial and non-judicial functions did not affect the address’s validity under constitutional law.

AllowedHigh Court of Australia·1998

High Court Quashes Convictions Over Evidence Act Errors

The High Court quashed convictions and ordered a new trial for someone a person of sexual offences against their daughter, due to errors in applying s 66 of the NSW a person Act. The court ruled that a person made years after alleged events is not admissible unless it meets strict temporal requirements.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1968

High Court Rejects Appeal on Prickly-Pear Eradication Payment

The High Court of Australia dismissed an appeal and refused leave to appeal regarding a payment required under the Prickly-pear Act for land from which prickly-pear was eradicated. The court ruled that owners must repay such payments, and the Commissioner can legally recover these funds.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1958

High Court Upholds Decision in Chrome Ore Payment Case

The High Court dismissed an appeal regarding a dispute over payment for chrome ore. The case involved whether a letter of credit was intended to be the sole method of payment or if other forms of payment were acceptable under the contract.

AllowedHigh Court of Australia·1974

High Court Upholds Employer’s Right to Indemnity for Fatal Injury Compensation

The High Court ruled in favour of an employer who sought to be reimbursed by a third party for compensation paid due to a fatal workplace injury. Despite the fact that a person's a person missed the deadline to sue the third party, the court found that the employer could still claim indemnity under the Workmen’s Compensation Act Ordinance.

AllowedHigh Court of Australia·1961

High Court Reverses Decision on Illegal Land Transfer Agreement

In this case, the High Court reversed a lower court's decision that dismissed a claim to cancel an illegal land sale contract. The original agreement violated state laws regulating the transfer of large tracts of grazing land. The High Court ruled in favour of the party seeking rescission based on equitable principles.

DismissedHigh Court of Australia·1999

High Court Rejects Habeas Corpus Application Over Invalid Judge Appointment

The High Court dismissed an application for habeas corpus, ruling that a judge appointed to the a person Supreme Court was invalid under the Constitution. The applicant argued that the appointment process did not follow constitutional requirements, but the court upheld previous decisions affirming that s 72 of the Constitution does not apply to a person courts.

AllowedHigh Court of Australia·1966

High Court Upholds Deduction for Vacating Premises

The High Court ruled that when a landlord pays money to a tenant who is legally entitled to stay on the property without a lease agreement, this payment can be deducted as an expense for tax purposes. This decision clarifies how landlords can claim deductions under Australian income tax law.

Page 1 · 100 judgmentsNext →